Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

(→‎Featured Articles)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
To become a contributor/editor, [http://pynchonwiki.com/mycaptcha/captcha-page.php '''Create an account.''']
 
To become a contributor/editor, [http://pynchonwiki.com/mycaptcha/captcha-page.php '''Create an account.''']
  
−
*[http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594204233/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1594204233&linkCode=as2&tag=pyncwiki-20'''Order ''Bleeding Edge''''' (Amazon)]
+
*[http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594204233/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1594204233&linkCode=as2&tag=pyncwiki-20&linkId=IMBUXUEYVM3X7NO4'''Order ''Bleeding Edge''''' (Amazon)]
 +
 
 
*Check out some [[#Featured Articles|'''Featured Articles''']]
 
*Check out some [[#Featured Articles|'''Featured Articles''']]
−
*[[Songs_mentioned_in_Bleeding_Edge|'''Songs''' mentioned in ''Bleeding Edge'']]
+
*[[Songs_mentioned_in_Bleeding_Edge|'''Musicians and works of music''' mentioned in ''Bleeding Edge'']]
 
*Penguin Press's [[Bleeding_Edge_trailer|'''trailer''']] for ''Bleeding Edge''
 
*Penguin Press's [[Bleeding_Edge_trailer|'''trailer''']] for ''Bleeding Edge''
  
Line 39: Line 40:
  
 
==Featured Articles==
 
==Featured Articles==
−
[[File:Michael-Chabon.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Photo: ''The East Bay Monthly'']]Wow! writer '''Michael Chabon''' delivers a wonderful, insightful review of ''Bleeding Edge''. Chabon's a long-time appreciator of Pynchon and his perspective on the work is unsurpassed: "One ought to be accustomed, by now, to Pynchon’s leaving his mysteries unresolved, or at least prepared to give him credit for having done so on purpose. Incompleteness is the inherent vice of paranoid theories of history, the limitation of such theories that Pynchon has always freely acknowledged. Criticism of Pynchon’s “shaggy dog” or sloppy plotting neglects the emphasis that he has always laid on the dual meaning of the word ''plot''. From ''V.'' forward, nearly all his novels have been founded on a bedrock of detective fiction and underlayed with science fiction, boy’s adventure, westerns, spy fiction, and other genres that rely, like conspiracy theories, on plotting. His broken plots expose the epistemological brokenness of paranoid systems, which are, after all, nothing but attempts, grander but no less doomed to failure than anyone’s, to make sense of a broken world." [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/nov/07/thomas-pynchon-crying-september-11/ Full article »]
+
[[File:Michael-Chabon.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Michael Chabon<br />Photo: ''The East Bay Monthly'']]'''Wow! Writer Michael Chabon delivers a wonderful, insightful review of ''Bleeding Edge''.''' Chabon's a long-time appreciator of Pynchon and his perspective on the work is unsurpassed, and his 11/07/13 review for ''The New York Review of Books'' is illuminating...<br />"One ought to be accustomed, by now, to Pynchon’s leaving his mysteries unresolved, or at least prepared to give him credit for having done so on purpose. Incompleteness is the inherent vice of paranoid theories of history, the limitation of such theories that Pynchon has always freely acknowledged. Criticism of Pynchon’s “shaggy dog” or sloppy plotting neglects the emphasis that he has always laid on the dual meaning of the word ''plot''. From ''V.'' forward, nearly all his novels have been founded on a bedrock of detective fiction and underlayed with science fiction, boy’s adventure, westerns, spy fiction, and other genres that rely, like conspiracy theories, on plotting. His broken plots expose the epistemological brokenness of paranoid systems, which are, after all, nothing but attempts, grander but no less doomed to failure than anyone’s, to make sense of a broken world." [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/nov/07/thomas-pynchon-crying-september-11/ Full article &#187;]
  
 
<p style="clear:both"></p>
 
<p style="clear:both"></p>
  
−
[[File:Harpers-Review-Pemberton-Illustration.png|thumb|left|200px|Illustration: Simon Pemberton]]An exellent ''Harper's Magazine'' article that combines a review of ''Bleeding Edge'' with detailed biographical and genealogical info on Mr. Pynchon. '''A Must Read!''': "''Bleeding Edge'', however, offers an indication that Pynchon has finally given up on seeking the soul of the nation his family helped found. For Pynchon — the embattled bard of the counterculture, disabused of all allegiance — the last redoubt has become the family, and the last war to be waged is between our virtual identities and the bonds of blood; a war to keep the Virtual from corrupting the Blood, if not forever, then for time enough to let the lil’ Ziggy and Otis Tarnow-Loefflers of this world live with the merest pretense of freedom (childhood). Pynchon understands that in the future there will be no secrets, no hidden complots — everything will be aired and any second life, whether in the cloud or in the firmament, will be despoiled or denied us. Adult sanity, then, must depend not on the lives we make online, but on the lives we make off it — our kids — on how we love them, and how we raise them, and the virtues and good-taste imperatives we pass on to them from our progenitors." [http://harpers.org/archive/2013/10/first-family-second-life/ Full article &#187;]
+
[[File:Harpers-Review-Pemberton-Illustration.png|thumb|left|200px|Illustration: Simon Pemberton]]'''An exellent ''Harper's Magazine'' article that combines a review of ''Bleeding Edge'' with detailed biographical and genealogical info on Mr. Pynchon, and a Must Read!'''<br />"''Bleeding Edge'', however, offers an indication that Pynchon has finally given up on seeking the soul of the nation his family helped found. For Pynchon — the embattled bard of the counterculture, disabused of all allegiance — the last redoubt has become the family, and the last war to be waged is between our virtual identities and the bonds of blood; a war to keep the Virtual from corrupting the Blood, if not forever, then for time enough to let the lil’ Ziggy and Otis Tarnow-Loefflers of this world live with the merest pretense of freedom (childhood). Pynchon understands that in the future there will be no secrets, no hidden complots — everything will be aired and any second life, whether in the cloud or in the firmament, will be despoiled or denied us. Adult sanity, then, must depend not on the lives we make online, but on the lives we make off it — our kids — on how we love them, and how we raise them, and the virtues and good-taste imperatives we pass on to them from our progenitors." [http://harpers.org/archive/2013/10/first-family-second-life/ Full article &#187;]
  
 
<p style="clear:both"></p>
 
<p style="clear:both"></p>
  
−
[[File:Lethem-BleedingEdge.jpg|left|200px|thumb|Image by Mario Wagner]] '''Jonathan Lethem's''' review of ''Bleeding Edge'' for '''The New York Times''', may be the most intelligent and insightful review of them all. Lethem ''gets'' it! "[There is] the sheer vitality and fascination, the plummets into beauty and horror, the unique flashes of galactic epiphany, in Pynchon’s method. Our reward for surrendering expectations that a novel should gather in clarity, rather than disperse into molecules, isn’t anomie but delight. Pynchon himself’s a good companion, full of real affection for his people and places, even as he lampoons them for suffering the postmodern condition of being only partly real. He spoils us with descriptive flights." [http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/15/books/review/bleeding-edge-by-thomas-pynchon.html Read the review...]
+
[[File:Lethem-BleedingEdge.jpg|left|200px|thumb|Illustration: Mario Wagner]] '''Jonathan Lethem's review of ''Bleeding Edge'' for ''The New York Times'' is one of the most intelligent and insightful reviews.''' Like Michael Chabon, Lethem ''gets'' it!<br />"[There is] the sheer vitality and fascination, the plummets into beauty and horror, the unique flashes of galactic epiphany, in Pynchon’s method. Our reward for surrendering expectations that a novel should gather in clarity, rather than disperse into molecules, isn’t anomie but delight. Pynchon himself’s a good companion, full of real affection for his people and places, even as he lampoons them for suffering the postmodern condition of being only partly real. He spoils us with descriptive flights." [http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/15/books/review/bleeding-edge-by-thomas-pynchon.html Read the review...]
 +
 
 
<p style="clear:both;margin-bottom:8px;"></p>
 
<p style="clear:both;margin-bottom:8px;"></p>
  
−
[[File:Michiko-Kakutani.jpg|left|75px|thumb|Image: Slate]] Noticing that ''New York Times'' critic '''Michiko Kakutani''' has panned every Pynchon novel after ''Mason & Dixon'' (1997) &#151; the latest target being [[Bleeding_Edge_Reviews#kakutani|''Bleeding Edge'']] &#151; I became curious as to just who this grumpy critic is. If you're curious too, read "Assessing Michiko Kakutani":  
+
[[File:Michiko-Kakutani.jpg|left|80px|thumb|Image: Slate]] Noticing that ''New York Times'' critic '''Michiko Kakutani''' has panned every Pynchon novel after ''Mason & Dixon'' (1997) &#151; the latest target being [[Bleeding_Edge_Reviews#kakutani|''Bleeding Edge'']] &#151; I became curious as to just who this grumpy critic is. If you're curious too, read "Assessing Michiko Kakutani":  
  
 
"Kakutani doesn't offer the stylistic flair, the wit, or the insight one gets from Kael and other first-rate critics; for her, the verdict is the only thing. One has the sense of her deciding roughly at Page 2 whether or not a book is worthy; reading the rest of it to gather evidence for her case; spending some quality time with the Thesaurus; and then taking a large blunt hammer and pounding the message home." [http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2006/04/michiko_kakutani.html Read on...]
 
"Kakutani doesn't offer the stylistic flair, the wit, or the insight one gets from Kael and other first-rate critics; for her, the verdict is the only thing. One has the sense of her deciding roughly at Page 2 whether or not a book is worthy; reading the rest of it to gather evidence for her case; spending some quality time with the Thesaurus; and then taking a large blunt hammer and pounding the message home." [http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2006/04/michiko_kakutani.html Read on...]
Line 76: Line 78:
 
* [https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=thomas+pynchon&oq=thomas+pynchon Latest news on Thomas Pynchon (Google News)]
 
* [https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=thomas+pynchon&oq=thomas+pynchon Latest news on Thomas Pynchon (Google News)]
 
* [http://www.thomaspynchon.com/ ThomasPynchon.com]
 
* [http://www.thomaspynchon.com/ ThomasPynchon.com]
 +
* [http://www.hashslingrz.com/ hashslingrz.com]
 
* [http://www.themodernword.com/pynchon/ The Modern Word Pynchon page]
 
* [http://www.themodernword.com/pynchon/ The Modern Word Pynchon page]
 
* [http://pynchonoid.blogspot.com/ Pynchonoid Blog]
 
* [http://pynchonoid.blogspot.com/ Pynchonoid Blog]

Latest revision as of 04:57, 27 December 2018

BE-Final-Cover.jpg
Welcome to the Bleeding Edge Wiki!

To become a contributor/editor, Create an account.



This is the Wiki for Thomas Pynchon's Bleeding Edge. Besides using the Alphabetical Index and the page-by-page annotation, you can also take a look at Bleeding Edge cover analyses, read the reviews, or entertain some theories on the source of the title.


How to Use this Wiki

There are two major ways to use this wiki. The first is the Bleeding Edge Alphabetical Index, used to keep track of the myriad characters, real and imagined, as well as events, arcana, and lots of other stuff. The second is the Spoiler-Free Annotations by Page, which allows the reader to look up and contribute allusions and references while reading the book, in a convenient and spoiler-free manner.

Apart from those, it's up to you.

Bleeding Edge Alpha Guide to Characters, Places & More

A·B·C·D·E·F·G·H·I·J·K·L·M·N·O·P·Q·R·S·T·U·V·W·XYZ TOP↑


Page by Page Annotations

Chapter 1
pp. 1-7 		Chapter 2
pp. 8-19 		Chapter 3
pp. 20-29 		Chapter 4
pp. 30-40 		Chapter 5
pp. 41-52
Chapter 6
pp. 53-67 		Chapter 7
pp. 68-79 		Chapter 8
pp. 80-86 		Chapter 9
pp. 87-95 		Chapter 10
pp. 96-111
Chapter 11
pp. 112-120 		Chapter 12
pp. 121-133 		Chapter 13
pp. 134-144 		Chapter 14
pp. 145-159 		Chapter 15
pp. 160-171
Chapter 16
pp. 172-184 		Chapter 17
pp. 185-197 		Chapter 18
pp. 198-210 		Chapter 19
pp. 211-218 		Chapter 20
pp. 219-229
Chapter 21
pp. 230-238 		Chapter 22
pp. 239-246 		Chapter 23
pp. 247-255 		Chapter 24
pp. 256-264 		Chapter 25
pp. 265-273
Chapter 26
pp. 274-287 		Chapter 27
pp. 288-300 		Chapter 28
pp. 301-313 		Chapter 29
pp. 314-326 		Chapter 30
pp. 327-337
Chapter 31
pp. 338-346 		Chapter 32
pp. 347-353 		Chapter 33
pp. 354-364 		Chapter 34
pp. 365-382 		Chapter 35
pp. 383-394
Chapter 36
pp. 395-407 		Chapter 37
pp. 408-422 		Chapter 38
pp. 423-438 		Chapter 39
pp. 439-447 		Chapter 40
pp. 448-462
Chapter 41
pp. 463-477


Featured Articles

Michael Chabon
Photo: The East Bay Monthly
Wow! Writer Michael Chabon delivers a wonderful, insightful review of Bleeding Edge. Chabon's a long-time appreciator of Pynchon and his perspective on the work is unsurpassed, and his 11/07/13 review for The New York Review of Books is illuminating...
"One ought to be accustomed, by now, to Pynchon’s leaving his mysteries unresolved, or at least prepared to give him credit for having done so on purpose. Incompleteness is the inherent vice of paranoid theories of history, the limitation of such theories that Pynchon has always freely acknowledged. Criticism of Pynchon’s “shaggy dog” or sloppy plotting neglects the emphasis that he has always laid on the dual meaning of the word plot. From V. forward, nearly all his novels have been founded on a bedrock of detective fiction and underlayed with science fiction, boy’s adventure, westerns, spy fiction, and other genres that rely, like conspiracy theories, on plotting. His broken plots expose the epistemological brokenness of paranoid systems, which are, after all, nothing but attempts, grander but no less doomed to failure than anyone’s, to make sense of a broken world." Full article »

Illustration: Simon Pemberton
An exellent Harper's Magazine article that combines a review of Bleeding Edge with detailed biographical and genealogical info on Mr. Pynchon, and a Must Read!
"Bleeding Edge, however, offers an indication that Pynchon has finally given up on seeking the soul of the nation his family helped found. For Pynchon — the embattled bard of the counterculture, disabused of all allegiance — the last redoubt has become the family, and the last war to be waged is between our virtual identities and the bonds of blood; a war to keep the Virtual from corrupting the Blood, if not forever, then for time enough to let the lil’ Ziggy and Otis Tarnow-Loefflers of this world live with the merest pretense of freedom (childhood). Pynchon understands that in the future there will be no secrets, no hidden complots — everything will be aired and any second life, whether in the cloud or in the firmament, will be despoiled or denied us. Adult sanity, then, must depend not on the lives we make online, but on the lives we make off it — our kids — on how we love them, and how we raise them, and the virtues and good-taste imperatives we pass on to them from our progenitors." Full article »

Illustration: Mario Wagner
Jonathan Lethem's review of Bleeding Edge for The New York Times is one of the most intelligent and insightful reviews. Like Michael Chabon, Lethem gets it!
"[There is] the sheer vitality and fascination, the plummets into beauty and horror, the unique flashes of galactic epiphany, in Pynchon’s method. Our reward for surrendering expectations that a novel should gather in clarity, rather than disperse into molecules, isn’t anomie but delight. Pynchon himself’s a good companion, full of real affection for his people and places, even as he lampoons them for suffering the postmodern condition of being only partly real. He spoils us with descriptive flights." Read the review...

Image: Slate
Noticing that New York Times critic Michiko Kakutani has panned every Pynchon novel after Mason & Dixon (1997) — the latest target being Bleeding Edge — I became curious as to just who this grumpy critic is. If you're curious too, read "Assessing Michiko Kakutani":

"Kakutani doesn't offer the stylistic flair, the wit, or the insight one gets from Kael and other first-rate critics; for her, the verdict is the only thing. One has the sense of her deciding roughly at Page 2 whether or not a book is worthy; reading the rest of it to gather evidence for her case; spending some quality time with the Thesaurus; and then taking a large blunt hammer and pounding the message home." Read on...

PubWeekly-logo.png
Bleeding Edge Review by David Kipen, for Publishers Weekly, is a well written and insightful appreciation of Pynchon's craft and his new novel! "No one, but no one, rivals Pynchon's range of language, his elasticity of syntax, his signature mix of dirty jokes, dread and shining decency." Read the review...

Pynchon Wiki Help and Contributor Guidelines

Click here for help with editing and creating pages.

We have a few conventions we ask that you follow:

  • When creating a new page, if its information pertains to one (and only one) specific Pynchon novel, please categorize it with the appropriate identifier. For example, a page pertaining to Bleeding Edge, should use the syntax [[Category:BE]].
  • To open a discussion on an individual listing of the Alpha Index, create one using the entry on Peter Tait as an example. Basically, give it a name that identifies the alpha listing (eg [[Name Discussion|DISCUSSION]]) and notice that the visible name will be "DISCUSSION" in full caps, so it stands out a bit.

External Links

  • Literarywiki.org - wiki annotations to works by Pynchon, Umberto Eco, and many others.

Image Gallery

Below are some of the images you will find on Pynchon Wiki.


Thanks, and enjoy...

Retrieved from "http://bleedingedge.pynchonwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=2686"
Personal tools